Papers signed. Popcorn ready. Let the games begin.
|
Papers signed. Popcorn ready. Let the games begin.
I like to celebrate, too?
What papers? Embercadero and RemObjects joins up for the next object pascal compiler?
Embercadero and RemObjects joins up for the next object pascal compiler?
I’m also “dreaming” for such a thing to happens…
Imagine, Oxygene integrated in DD2009 : asp .net / delphi / compact framework….
and Silverlight, WCF, Mono, circular unit references, cases with strings, Class Contracts …
Congratulations!
Whatever it might be, I feel that it will be for good :)
This post makes me feel excited and relieved. Hope that something big happen sooner or later.
Marc, don’t you want to give us more details ?
@Stephane: where’s the fun in that? ;)
seriously, though, we’ll have more information coming in the next few weeks, but right now we’re concentrating on new releases of our entire product suite, due at the end of this week.
but stay tuned here and to our company news feed for more – we have a couple of very exciting months ahead of us. very good stuff.
thanx,
marc
Look at the categories: RemObjects, Oxygene, .NET, Visual Studio, Mono, Cocoa.
It seems like it has more to do with VisualStudio/.NET than with Delphi…
Sounds exciting:)
Good Jobs
Very cool!
Excellent news! Will await the public preview of MonoTouch so we can give it a try!
Does this mean we will need a Mac that can run the iPhone dev tool chain to publish to the iPhone still? Or will we be able to do iPhone development on the PC now?
Either way, excellent news! Very exciting.
Do you expect that RemObjects SDK for .NET to also work on MonoTouch? Unlike you, I far prefer C# (or Prism) to Objective-C!
Very cute! Really quite cool.
Now, if we could just do something about the gaping chasm between Delphi.Net and Delphi.Prism then we’d be in a very good place indeed!
Jim: you’ll need a Mac to package and sign the final iPhone binary. Also to run the Simulator. You’ll of course be able to compile the managed executable in Visual Studio, on a PC.
Brian: not sure yet. i’m expecting RO to butt heads with some of the limitations of the MonoTouch runtime, such as no GetType(), no Activator. It might be better to provide a MonoTouch wrapper for RO/OSX, than to use RO/.NET. We’ll have to see. Not at the very top of our priorities right now, tbh.
Raymond: not gonna happen.the chasm is there for a reason ;)