<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life after Prism (1.0)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2008/12/06/p243/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2008/12/06/p243</link>
	<description>Remobjects Software Blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fabricio [Visitor]</title>
		<link>http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2008/12/06/p243/comment-page-1#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabricio [Visitor]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.remobjects.com/wordpress/?p=175#comment-268</guid>
		<description>@Adam Craig&lt;br /&gt;
Adam, the problem of this is that all the extentions and traps of the old Delphi.NET incarnation must be translated to Oxygene. Believe me, I worked with VCL.NET for 2 years and, although a brilliant result, you need to know .NET to get things working again (example: initialiation and finalization sections does not work as expected in .NET and the compiler can do NOTHING about it - the way the Framework initialize things really screw up these sections).&lt;br /&gt;
Prism - or better, the Oxygene compiler- it&#039;s a translation from scratch of Object Pascal to .NET Framework, following the rules and practices of the CLR runtime platform. &lt;br /&gt;
Am I wrong on thinking this way, Marc?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam Craig<br />
Adam, the problem of this is that all the extentions and traps of the old Delphi.NET incarnation must be translated to Oxygene. Believe me, I worked with VCL.NET for 2 years and, although a brilliant result, you need to know .NET to get things working again (example: initialiation and finalization sections does not work as expected in .NET and the compiler can do NOTHING about it &#8211; the way the Framework initialize things really screw up these sections).<br />
Prism &#8211; or better, the Oxygene compiler- it&#8217;s a translation from scratch of Object Pascal to .NET Framework, following the rules and practices of the CLR runtime platform. <br />
Am I wrong on thinking this way, Marc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Craig Johnston [Visitor]</title>
		<link>http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2008/12/06/p243/comment-page-1#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Craig Johnston [Visitor]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.remobjects.com/wordpress/?p=175#comment-267</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used ShineOn, a very poor subset of the VCL.NET. No Designer and VCL.NET components. My thinking is that just VCL.NET should be in RAD Studio using Oxygene as the compiler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used ShineOn, a very poor subset of the VCL.NET. No Designer and VCL.NET components. My thinking is that just VCL.NET should be in RAD Studio using Oxygene as the compiler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc hoffman [Member]</title>
		<link>http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2008/12/06/p243/comment-page-1#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>marc hoffman [Member]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.remobjects.com/wordpress/?p=175#comment-266</guid>
		<description>@Adam: have you looked at ShineOn yet?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam: have you looked at ShineOn yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Craig Johnston [Visitor]</title>
		<link>http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2008/12/06/p243/comment-page-1#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Craig Johnston [Visitor]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.remobjects.com/wordpress/?p=175#comment-265</guid>
		<description>What they need now is to recompile VCL.NET using Oxygene for Delphi 2009
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they need now is to recompile VCL.NET using Oxygene for Delphi 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex Li [Visitor]</title>
		<link>http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2008/12/06/p243/comment-page-1#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex Li [Visitor]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 02:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.remobjects.com/wordpress/?p=175#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Well, The &quot;shopping cart&quot; is a wonderful idea. It reminds me of both Delphi for .NET and SharpDevelop.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, The &#8220;shopping cart&#8221; is a wonderful idea. It reminds me of both Delphi for .NET and SharpDevelop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cass McNutt [Visitor]</title>
		<link>http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2008/12/06/p243/comment-page-1#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Cass McNutt [Visitor]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 00:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.remobjects.com/wordpress/?p=175#comment-263</guid>
		<description>&quot;It seems that a lot of people who never gave Oxygene a second thought are looking at Prism now, and liking what they are seeing.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the main reason I was excited and encouraged to see the deal w/Embarcadero.    While Chrome/Oxygene were technically compelling, the marketing/mindshare momentum was not nearly so.  I think shifting to &quot;Prism&quot; has and will continue to change that perception dramatically.  Congrats!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It seems that a lot of people who never gave Oxygene a second thought are looking at Prism now, and liking what they are seeing.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the main reason I was excited and encouraged to see the deal w/Embarcadero.    While Chrome/Oxygene were technically compelling, the marketing/mindshare momentum was not nearly so.  I think shifting to &#8220;Prism&#8221; has and will continue to change that perception dramatically.  Congrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc hoffman [Member]</title>
		<link>http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2008/12/06/p243/comment-page-1#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>marc hoffman [Member]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.remobjects.com/wordpress/?p=175#comment-262</guid>
		<description>@Sebastian: (a) yes, this is the standard Add Reference dialog, expanded with an extra tab. we have no plans to &quot;reinvent the wheel&quot; and replace Visual Studio UI that works fine. (b) Afaik the dialog does not load all the COM references unless/until you switch to the COM tab.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sebastian: (a) yes, this is the standard Add Reference dialog, expanded with an extra tab. we have no plans to &#8220;reinvent the wheel&#8221; and replace Visual Studio UI that works fine. (b) Afaik the dialog does not load all the COM references unless/until you switch to the COM tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian P.R. Gingter [Visitor]</title>
		<link>http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2008/12/06/p243/comment-page-1#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian P.R. Gingter [Visitor]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.remobjects.com/wordpress/?p=175#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Cool :)&lt;br /&gt;
But from that screenshot I actually fear, that makes use of the default &#039;Add Reference&#039; dialog and just plugs in it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Replacing the &#039;Add Reference&#039; dialog with a dialog that does not load all COM references in a first place would make that dialog a lot faster. But that&#039;s a MS point after all..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool :)<br />
But from that screenshot I actually fear, that makes use of the default &#8216;Add Reference&#8217; dialog and just plugs in it?</p>
<p>Replacing the &#8216;Add Reference&#8217; dialog with a dialog that does not load all COM references in a first place would make that dialog a lot faster. But that&#8217;s a MS point after all..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
