> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://blogs.remobjects.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Why your customers don't want .NET application
- URL: https://blogs.remobjects.com/2005/06/21/why-your-customers-dont-want-net-application/
- Published: 2005-06-21T16:16:20.000Z
- Updated: 2018-08-22T06:17:36.000Z
- Author: marc hoffman
- Tags: #Import 2026-08-17 20:17

I keep reading – in blogs, in non-tech and seemingly everywhere else – how .NET  
is over-hyped technology. The newsgroup is full of people clinging to Win32 and  
stating they see "no demand" for .NET applications. *I don’t have any* 
*customers out there chanting, "We want our .NET Apps!"* writes [one blogger](http://www.simventions.com/gustavson/2005/06/customer-interest-needs-net-win32.html?ref=blogs.remobjects.com).

Well. Newsflash. *Of course* customers don’t want .NET applications. Matter  
of fact they don’t want Win32 or Win64 applications either, nor do they want Java  
applications. If your customers are anything like the customers i have been working  
with (before going into developer tools with RemObjects Software), they couldn’t care  
less about what your application is developed in. They don’t want .NET apps, they  
don’t want Win32 apps – what they want is *apps that do the job*.

It’s not your customer’s job to decide which tools are right for the job at hand  
(nor is your customer gonna be very good at it, if he tries), it’s your job as developer  
or project manager to make that assessment, and convince the customer to let you  
pick the right tools for the right job. If the application you deliver is well-written,  
delivered on time and does it’s job, it will not matter to your customer what it  
was written in – Win32, Java\* or .NET.

It’s your job to *make* your customer want .NET apps. And he will want them  
because .NET gives *you*, as the developer, a huge productivity boost. To the  
customer, that means well-working applications, delivered well in time an at lower  
cost. And *that* is the kind of application that customers want, in my experience.

I’ve seen this question asked in borland.public.delphi.non-tech a few times: "I  
can see that .NET has benefits for the developer – but what’s in it for my end users?".  
The answer is: nothing. and everything. Any application that can be written in .NET  
could also be written exactly the same way in Delphi/Win32 – or in assembler, for  
that matter. The *only* advantage to any modern development tool is developer  
productivity. Which for the customer translates to better software, delivered in  
a better timeframe. What other possible "end user feature" could a development  
tool offer?

\[\*of course i have yet to see a well-written Java application that does it’s job.  
But that’s a topic for a different day ;-\]